Pengaruh Representativeness Bias dan Availability Bias terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi

Anindya Radita Maiziyah; Nayang Helmayunita

doi:10.24036/jnka.v1i3.33

Anindya Radita Maiziyah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Nayang Helmayunita Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jnka.v1i3.33

Keywords: representativeness, availability, investment decisions

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the influence of representativeness and availability on investment decisions. This research is included in the type of associative causality research using a quantitative approach. Researchers collected data using a questionnaire distributed to 349 respondents from UNP, UNAND and PNP accounting students. The data used in this research is primary data. Hypothesis testing in this research uses multiple linear regression analysis with IBM SPSS. Based on research findings and discussions, the following conclusions can be drawn: Representativeness influences investment decisions significantly and positively. This shows that the first hypothesis (H1) proposed can be accepted. Availability influences investment decisions positively and significantly. This means that the first hypothesis (H1) proposed is accepted.

References

Anisa, N. (2012). Hubungan Faktor Demografi Dengan Bias Pemikiran Investor Di Pasar Modal. Journal of Business and Banking, 2(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v2i2.169

Arora, M., & Kumari, S. (2015). Risk Taking in Financial Decisions as a Function of Age, Gender: Mediating Role of Loss Aversion and Regret. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(4), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20150504.01

Asri, M. (2013). Keuangan Keperilakuan. Guru Besar FakultasEkonomika Dan Bisnis Universitas Gajah Mada.

Dangol, J., & Manandhar, R. (2020). Impact of Heuristics on Investment Decisions: The Moderating Role of Locus of Control. Journal of Business and Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3126/jbssr.v5i1.30195

Gumelar, G. (2018). Darmin Sebut Reaksi Investor Berlebihan Respons Krisis Turki. CNN Indonesia.

Kartini, & Nugraha, N. F. (2015). Pengaruh Illusions of Control, Overconfidence Dan Emotion Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi Pada Investor Di Yogyakarta. Ajie, 4(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol4.iss2.art6

Khan, H. H., Naz, I., Qureshi, F., & Ghafoor, A. (2017). Heuristics and stock buying decision: Evidence from Malaysian and Pakistani stock markets. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.12.002

Liyanarachchi, G. A., & Milne, M. J. (2005). Comparing the investment decisions of accounting practitioners and students: An empirical study on the adequacy of student surrogates. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.05.001

Nada, S. M. A., & Moamer, F. A. (2013). Behavioural Factors Influencing Investment Decision Making: An Empirical Study of Palestine Stock Exchange. 159.

Ngoc, L. T. B. (2013). Behavior Pattern of Individual Investors in Stock Market. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n1p1

Nyamute, W. I. (2016). INVESTOR BEHAVIOUR , INVESTOR DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS , INVESTMENT STYLE AND INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE AT THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE ( Business Administration ) JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF.

Pompian, M. (2012). Behavioral Finance and Investor Type. CFA Institute.

Shah, S. Z. A., Ahmad, M., & Mahmood, F. (2018). Heuristic biases in investment decision-making and perceived market efficiency: A survey at the Pakistan stock exchange. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0033

Supramono, Nastiti, P . K . Y Damayanti, T. . W. (2018). Keuangan Berbasis Perilaku. Penerbit ANDI.

Tandelilin, E. (2017). Pasar Modal Manajemen Portfolio & Investasi. PT Kanisius.